Projection Evaluations - Pitching Benchmarks (3/17/08)

As I mentioned in my previous post, I’ll be evaluating several popular, widely-available sets of fantasy baseball projections over the next few days. The goal is to determine whether each set of projections can serve as a realistic base for ranking players for your fantasy baseball draft or auction.

Here are some of the benchmarks based on 2005-07 MLB data that I’ll be using to evaluate the Pitchers’ projections:

  1. Total Innings Pitched (IP) for all Pitchers, all Teams should be in the range of 43,200-43,400.
  2. Total IP for a Team should range from 1,400-1,500.
  3. The number of Wins and the number of Losses should both equal 2,430.
  4. The number of Saves as a percentage of the number of Wins should range from 49%-52%, implying that the number of Saves should range from 1,190-1,265.
  5. The number of Earned Runs Allowed should be in the range of 20,500-21,750.
  6. The overall Earned Run Average (ERA) should be in the range of 4.25-4.50. Contrary to “conventional wisdom”, the difference between National League and American League ERA has been negligible over the past 2-3 years.
  7. Total Walks Allowed should be in the range of 15,000-16,250.
  8. Total Hits Allowed should range from 44,000-45,250.
  9. Aggregate Walks + Hits per Inning Pitch (aka “WHIP or “Ratio”) should be in the range of 1.37-1.41.

As I stated in the “Hitting Benchmarks” post, if the set of projections underlying the player rankings/dollar values you’re using is inaccurate, then the resulting player rankings/dollar values are also likely to be inaccurate. Again, this problem will probably not be apparent to you in the early stages of your draft/auction - you’ll probably find that all projections for the top-tier players will be reasonably close to one another.

However, once you reach the second and third-tier players (where fantasy drafts/auctions are won and lost), it’s imperative to be working from a reasonable set of projections. If you aren’t, chances are you’ll be significantly overstating or understating a player’s true worth.

If it turns out you are working from an inaccurate set of projections, you have 2 options: (1) Hope/pray that everyone else in your league is also working from a set of projections that’s at least as inaccurate as the one you’re using, or (2) Throw away your current set of player projections/rankings/values and look for a better alternative. Again, over the next few days my goal is to be able to help you do just that!

Until next time,

The Sherpa

Tags: , , ,

3 Responses to “Projection Evaluations - Pitching Benchmarks (3/17/08)”

  1. Erin Says:

    Erin…

    Thanks for the blog!…

  2. The Fantasy Baseball Sherpa » Blog Archive » Projections Evaluation - CBS Sportsline Pitchers (4/7/08) Says:

    […] Here’s a review of the Pitchers’ projections available at CBS Sportsline.  I’ll use the benchmarks laid out in my 3/17 post on Pitchers. […]

  3. The Fantasy Baseball Sherpa » Blog Archive » Projections Evaluation - Fantasy Baseball Sherpa Pitchers (4/8/08) Says:

    […] Here’s a review of my Fantasy Baseball Sherpa Pitchers’ projections.  I’ll use the benchmarks laid out in my 3/17 post on Pitchers. […]