Predictions for 2010 Bloomberg Challenge (Tue 3/16/10)
Hi everyone,
Last night the draft for the inaugural Bloomberg Fantasy Baseball Challenge was held on RealTime Sports’ website. This is a 5×5 league which includes 6 fantasy baseball enthusiasts, who were chosen from among ~300 applicants, and 6 industry experts. The league uses the usual 5×5 scoring categories (AVG, HR, RBI, R, SB for hitters; W, SV, ERA, WHIP, K for pitchers). Rosters consist of 14 hitters (2 Catchers, 1 1B, 1 2B, 1 SS, 1 3B, 5 OF, 1 1B/3B, 1 2B/SS, 1 Util), 9 pitchers, and a 5-player Bench.
Here are the 12 participants for 2010 in the order they drafted (affiliation noted for industry experts):
- Lawr Michaels - Mastersball.com
- Ron Shandler - BaseballHQ.com
- Martha Mitchell
- Rob Reed
- Harold Reynolds - MLB Network
- Tim Heaney - KFFL.com
- Jonathan Levey
- David Roher
- Paul Farrell
- Derek VanRiper - Rotowire.com
- Satoshi Kii
- Steve Gardner - USA Today
Here’s a link to the RealTime Fantasy Sports website’s league page that details each team’s roster.
I used the 2010 projections from my Fantasy Baseball Sherpa website to predict the standings based on the results of last night’s draft:
Projections by Team (in draft order) - Hitting Categories
|
Owner |
AB |
AVG |
HR |
RBI |
SB |
R |
|
Michaels |
7,846 |
.288 |
261 |
1,145 |
194 |
1,238 |
|
Shandler |
7,626 |
.285 |
270 |
1,080 |
195 |
1,189 |
|
Mitchell |
7,399 |
.278 |
292 |
1,092 |
198 |
1,114 |
|
Reed |
7,986 |
.283 |
286 |
1,126 |
227 |
1,214 |
|
Reynolds |
7.665 |
.276 |
292 |
1,126 |
142 |
1,150 |
|
Heaney |
7,618 |
.284 |
296 |
1,167 |
219 |
1,211 |
|
Levey |
7,630 |
.288 |
280 |
1,172 |
227 |
1,207 |
|
Roher |
7,558 |
.288 |
265 |
1,106 |
194 |
1,182 |
|
Farrell |
7,748 |
.278 |
312 |
1,211 |
139 |
1,175 |
|
VanRiper |
7,622 |
.285 |
272 |
1,142 |
179 |
1,198 |
|
|
7,086 |
.281 |
273 |
1,079 |
201 |
1,097 |
|
Gardner |
7,506 |
.282 |
257 |
1,059 |
188 |
1,144 |
|
Owner |
IP |
W |
SV |
ERA |
WHIP |
K |
|
|
1,369 |
83 |
98 |
3.62 |
1.20 |
1,167 |
|
Shandler |
1,336 |
83 |
36 |
3.98 |
1.26 |
1,314 |
|
Mitchell |
1,312 |
80 |
90 |
3.72 |
1.27 |
1,244 |
|
Reed |
1,221 |
73 |
88 |
3.55 |
1.21 |
1,179 |
|
Reynolds |
1,310 |
80 |
81 |
3.76 |
1.30 |
1,067 |
|
Heaney |
1,409 |
82 |
59 |
3.79 |
1.26 |
1,201 |
|
Levey |
1,485 |
90 |
68 |
3.81 |
1.23 |
1,185 |
|
Roher |
1,400 |
84 |
71 |
3.70 |
1.23 |
1,293 |
|
Farrell |
1,370 |
85 |
76 |
3.60 |
1.22 |
1,217 |
|
VanRiper |
1,469 |
90 |
66 |
4.07 |
1.30 |
1,238 |
|
|
1,312 |
77 |
62 |
3.57 |
1.25 |
1,239 |
|
Gardner |
1,406 |
89 |
58 |
3.75 |
1.24 |
1,161 |
Projected Standings (in order of finish)
|
Owner |
H Pts |
P Pts |
Total Pts |
|
Levey |
49 |
33 |
82 |
|
Michaels |
38 |
42 |
80 |
|
Reed |
42 |
38 |
80 |
|
|
33 |
44 |
77 |
|
Roher |
31 |
43 |
74 |
|
Heaney |
48 |
23 |
71 |
|
VanRiper |
32 |
27 |
59 |
|
Mitchell |
25 |
34 |
59 |
|
Shandler |
30 |
25 |
55 |
|
Kii |
22 |
32 |
54 |
|
|
14 |
27 |
41 |
|
Reynolds |
22 |
19 |
41 |
Keep in mind, this is just one man’s opinion, not an “answer key”. However, I thought this would be of interest since I am an independent observer rather than a participant. Hopefully, all 12 of the participants came out of the draft feeling good about their team. Hope springs eternal before the actual games begin.
Several other reasons why the actual results are likely to differ from the projected standings above:
- At the risk of stating the obvious, players’ actual results may differ from their projected results, sometimes significantly so. This can be due to a myriad of reasons including injuries, suspensions, role changes (e.g. - bench player becomes a starter, or vice versa), changes in batting order position, trades, Closer changes, etc.
- There appeared to be a glitch in the draft software. Occasionally, a drafted player seemingly destined for a given team’s bench was placed in the starting lineup over a player with greater fantasy value. Apparently, these decisions were based on alphabetical order or something equally irrelevant (e.g. - just a hunch, but I doubt Tim Heaney would choose to start Kelly Shoppach at Utility and keep Jayson Werth on the bench). I did my best to account for these discrepancies in order to optimize each team’s expected results.
- Some participants, especially Reed, Kii, and Mitchell, took more chances than others in drafting talented players who are either injured or likely to start the season in the minors. Of course, in the actual contest, the owners will replace the players in the lineup, which will improve their results in at least the counting stat categories, but I did not attempt to adjust for this factor. Thus, my projected results for these owners may be a bit conservative.
- Some owners will prove to be more adept (or luckier) than others at making in-season trades (if the league decides to allow them), free agent pickups, etc.
Even with the above caveats I’m still confident that the projected standings gives a reasonably accurate picture of the teams’ relative strength coming out of last night’s draft. Let’s see what happens as the season unwinds - good luck to all the participants!
The Sherpa
The Fantasy Baseball Sherpa’s Blog
@fantasy_sherpa on Twitter
The Fantasy Baseball Sherpa’s Facebook fan page
Tags: , BaseballHQ.com, Bloomberg Fantasy Baseball Challenge, David Roher, Derek VanRiper, fantasy baseball sherpa, fantasy_sherpa, Harold Reynolds, Jayson Werth, Jonathan Levey, Kelly Shoppach, KFFL.com, Lawr Michaels, Martha Mitchell, Mastersball.com, MLB Network, Paul Farrell, RealTime Sports, Rob Reed, Ron Shandler, Rotowire.com, Satoshi Kii, Steve Gardner, The Fantasy Baseball Sherpa's Blog, The Fantasy Baseball Sherpa's Facebook fan page, The Sherpa, Tim Heaney, USA Today