Stream Team (CONT) (Fri 3/27/09)
Friday, March 27th, 2009Hi everyone,
In leagues that allow daily lineup changes some fantasy owners return year after year to the tactic of streaming pitchers as predictably as the swallows return each year to San Juan Capistrano. Many fantasy owners despise this polarizing tactic even more than they despise the thought of seven-figure bonuses being paid to AIG execs. Whichever side of the debate you come down on, unless your league rules are designed specifically to discourage it, there’s probably at least one owner in your league who employs it.
Simply put, owners seek to decide which pitcher among several with similar talent (or lack thereof) to use in their starting lineup based on the pitchers’ upcoming matchups. These decisions are usually based on perceptions of teams’ offensive capabilities (or lack thereof). However, there is actually a way to quantify teams’ offensive abilities that can guide owners in their selection of pitchers.
Here’s how the method works. Decide on the hitting team categories you wish to use to measure a team’s offensive strength. Ideally, these would mirror the pitching categories your league uses, but that’s not essential. For instance, if your league uses the standard 5 pitching categories of Wins, Saves, Strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, you might choose team losses (which is a good choice for both Wins & Saves), hitters’ strikeouts, runs scored, and walks+hits. Next, decide whether each hitting category you’ve chosen is a “positive” statistic (e.g. - runs scored, walks+hits) or a “negative” statistic (e.g. - losses, strikeouts).
For the “positive” stats give the league leading team a score of 1.00 and all other teams a score based on the ratio of their result to the league leading team’s result. For example, if the league leading team were projected to score 900 runs, a team projected to score 720 runs would receive a score of .80 ( = 720/900). For “negative” stats give the league leading team a score of -1.00 and all other teams a score based on the ratio of their result to the league leading team’s result. For example, if the league leading team were projected to strike out 1000 times, then a team that’s projected to strike out 750 times would receive a score of -0.75. By adding together a team’s result in each of the categories you’ve decided to measure, you can get a good gauge of their hitters’ abilities (at least from a fantasy perspective!) The higher a team’s hitting score, the better, so if you’re trying to select a team to stream a pitcher against, you’d want to pick teams with a low team hitting score.
For example, if I decide to measure a team’s hitting capabilities using the standard categories of AVG, Runs Scored, Home Runs, RBIs, and Stolen Bases, the maximum team hitting score would be 5.00, since all five are “positive” categories, and the maximum score in each category is 1.00 (I’ve used a proxy statistic for AVG). Using these five categories, here’s how I’d rank the 30 teams heading into the 2009 season (followed by their projected score on a scale with a maximum value of 5.00).
- Washington 2.58
- San Diego 2.70
- Arizona 2.96
- Pittsburgh 3.03
- Detroit 3.10
- San Francisco 3.10
- Toronto 3.19
- Chicago White Sox 3.25
- Florida Marlins 3.25
- Seattle 3.27
- Atlanta 3.29
- St. Louis 3.31
- Kansas City 3.32
- Colorado 3.36
- Cincinnati 3.39
- Milwaukee 3.42
- Houston 3.45
- Oakland 3.50
- Cleveland 3.51
- Minnesota 3.69
- Tampa Bay 3.69
- New York Mets 3.79
- Los Angeles Dodgers 3.96
- Philadelphia Phillies 4.02
- Boston Red Sox 4.04
- Baltimore Orioles 4.07
- Texas Rangers 4.13
- Chicago Cubs 4.28
- New York Yankees 4.48
- Los Angeles Angels 4.54
The exact rankings aren’t as important as the tiers that are formed. For example, using the hitting categories outlined above, there’s not much to pick from between the Phillies and the Red Sox, but there’s a huge difference between either of these teams and the Pirates & Diamondbacks.
These rankings will vary somewhat based on the hitting categories you choose, but again, I suspect the Phillies and Red Sox would fare much better than the Pirates and Diamondbacks for just about any imaginable group of hitting categories you’d select.
Stream away!
Until next time,
The Sherpa