Posts Tagged ‘Satoshi Kii’

Predictions for 2010 Bloomberg Challenge (Tue 3/16/10)

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

Hi everyone,

Last night the draft for the inaugural Bloomberg Fantasy Baseball Challenge was held on RealTime Sports’ website.  This is a 5×5 league which includes 6 fantasy baseball enthusiasts, who were chosen from among ~300 applicants, and 6 industry experts.  The league uses the usual 5×5 scoring categories (AVG, HR, RBI, R, SB for hitters; W, SV, ERA, WHIP, K for pitchers).  Rosters consist of 14 hitters (2 Catchers, 1 1B, 1 2B, 1 SS, 1 3B, 5 OF, 1 1B/3B, 1 2B/SS, 1 Util), 9 pitchers, and a 5-player Bench. 

Here are the 12 participants for 2010 in the order they drafted (affiliation noted for industry experts):

  1. Lawr Michaels - Mastersball.com
  2. Ron Shandler - BaseballHQ.com
  3. Martha Mitchell
  4. Rob Reed
  5. Harold Reynolds - MLB Network
  6. Tim Heaney - KFFL.com
  7. Jonathan Levey
  8. David Roher
  9. Paul Farrell
  10. Derek VanRiper - Rotowire.com
  11. Satoshi Kii
  12. Steve Gardner - USA Today

Here’s a link to the RealTime Fantasy Sports website’s league page that details each team’s roster.

I used the 2010 projections from my Fantasy Baseball Sherpa website to predict the standings based on the results of last night’s draft:

Projections by Team (in draft order) - Hitting Categories


Owner

AB

AVG

HR

RBI

SB

R

Michaels

7,846

.288

261

1,145

194

1,238

Shandler

7,626

.285

270

1,080

195

1,189

Mitchell

7,399

.278

292

1,092

198

1,114

Reed

7,986

.283

286

1,126

227

1,214

Reynolds

7.665

.276

292

1,126

142

1,150

Heaney

7,618

.284

296

1,167

219

1,211

Levey

7,630

.288

280

1,172

227

1,207

Roher

7,558

.288

265

1,106

194

1,182

Farrell

7,748

.278

312

1,211

139

1,175

VanRiper

7,622

.285

272

1,142

179

1,198

Kii

7,086

.281

273

1,079

201

1,097

Gardner

7,506

.282

257

1,059

188

1,144

  
Projections by Team (in draft order) - Pitching Categories


Owner

IP

W

SV

ERA

WHIP

K

Michaels

1,369

83

98

3.62

1.20

1,167

Shandler

1,336

83

36

3.98

1.26

1,314

Mitchell

1,312

80

90

3.72

1.27

1,244

Reed

1,221

73

88

3.55

1.21

1,179

Reynolds

1,310

80

81

3.76

1.30

1,067

Heaney

1,409

82

59

3.79

1.26

1,201

Levey

1,485

90

68

3.81

1.23

1,185

Roher

1,400

84

71

3.70

1.23

1,293

Farrell

1,370

85

76

3.60

1.22

1,217

VanRiper

1,469

90

66

4.07

1.30

1,238

Kii

1,312

77

62

3.57

1.25

1,239

Gardner

1,406

89

58

3.75

1.24

1,161

 

 

Projected Standings (in order of finish)


Owner

H Pts

P Pts

Total Pts

Levey

49

33

82

Michaels

38

42

80

Reed

42

38

80

Farrell

33

44

77

Roher

31

43

74

Heaney

48

23

71

VanRiper

32

27

59

Mitchell

25

34

59

Shandler

30

25

55

Kii

22

32

54

Gardner

14

27

41

Reynolds

22

19

41

 

 

Keep in mind, this is just one man’s opinion, not an “answer key”.  However, I thought this would be of interest since I am an independent observer rather than a participant.  Hopefully, all 12 of the participants came out of the draft feeling good about their team.  Hope springs eternal before the actual games begin.

 

Several other reasons why the actual results are likely to differ from the projected standings above:

 

  • At the risk of stating the obvious, players’ actual results may differ from their projected results, sometimes significantly so.  This can be due to a myriad of reasons including injuries, suspensions, role changes (e.g. - bench player becomes a starter, or vice versa), changes in batting order position, trades, Closer changes, etc.
  • There appeared to be a glitch in the draft software.  Occasionally, a drafted player seemingly destined for a given team’s bench was placed in the starting lineup over a player with greater fantasy value.  Apparently, these decisions were based on alphabetical order or something equally irrelevant (e.g. - just a hunch, but I doubt Tim Heaney would choose to start Kelly Shoppach at Utility and keep Jayson Werth on the bench).  I did my best to account for these discrepancies in order to optimize each team’s expected results.
  • Some participants, especially Reed, Kii, and Mitchell, took more chances than others in drafting talented players who are either injured or likely to start the season in the minors.  Of course, in the actual contest, the owners will replace the players in the lineup, which will improve their results in at least the counting stat categories, but I did not attempt to adjust for this factor.  Thus, my projected results for these owners may be a bit conservative.
  • Some owners will prove to be more adept (or luckier) than others at making in-season trades (if the league decides to allow them), free agent pickups, etc.

Even with the above caveats I’m still confident that the projected standings gives a reasonably accurate picture of the teams’ relative strength coming out of last night’s draft.  Let’s see what happens as the season unwinds - good luck to all the participants!

The Sherpa

Fantasy Baseball Sherpa

The Fantasy Baseball Sherpa’s Blog

@fantasy_sherpa on Twitter

The Fantasy Baseball Sherpa’s Facebook fan page